August 2017
M T W T F S S
« Jul    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Two Columbus Circle: An Appeal to the Mayor

Seven major preservation organizations sent a letter to Mayor Michael Bloomberg asking him to support a Landmarks Preservation Commission hearing on 2 Columbus Circle. The groups range from city-wide to national and international organizations. The organizations are the New York/Tri-State Chapter of DOCOMOMO, Historic Districts Council, The Municipal Art Society of New York, National Trust for Historic Preservation, New York Landmarks Conservancy, Preservation League of New York State and World Monuments Fund. The organizations cited the prominent architects, scholars, newspapers, and groups who support a hearing on Edward Durrell Stone’s important but controversial 1964 structure. “We regret that the debate over this controversy has become so prolonged and embittered,” the letter stated. “We believe it would be beneficial for all parties if the commission would act to resolve this matter once and for all….” The letter was delivered to the mayor on Monday, July 11. Several of the groups began asking for a Landmarks hearing in 1999. Both appreciation of 2 Columbus Circle’s design and requests for a fair and impartial hearing have grown substantially since that time. Most recently, Bernadette Castro, the New York State Parks Commissioner and State Historic Preservation Officer, has stated that 2 Columbus Circle “does appear to meet the criteria for listing on the State and National Registers of Historic Places.” A state review board could vote on listing the building in September. The organizations believe that the significant number of established groups and individuals seeking a hearing, as well as a growing recognition of the need to consider landmarking more recent buildings, should enable the Landmarks Commission to reconsider its earlier decision against a hearing and schedule one now. The seven preservation organizations find it hard to understand why a building with such significant and widespread support is not worthy of a fair and impartial landmarks hearing before its exterior features are gone forever.